I will keep this at the top for now
The following is from libertygb.org.uk/
There is only one acceptable and viable mindset against an ideology that is built upon the treacherous tenets of warmongering, misogyny, pedophilia and religious bigotry: Death to Islam.
Islam represents the very antithesis of Western civilization. From its history of brutal conquest and subjugation to its doctrine of hyper-supremacy, Islam has no place in a civilized society built upon the maxim that all men are created equal.
The Koran (Islam’s playbook) contains over 109 violent verses that demand jihad against the infidel. And these verses have not only been quoted by ISIS, but also by the so-called lone wolves as they slaughtered innocents from San Bernardino to Nice.
Presidential wannabe Hillary Clinton continues (ad nauseum) her defense of Islam to the great detriment of Western civilization. She not only calls it a “great” and “tolerant” religion that has “blessed” so many, but she has also called for a dramatic increase in the number of Syrian refugees being admitted to America.
Of course, Hillary couldn’t care less that a majority of these refugees believe that Islamic law is superior to any form of Western jurisprudence, and given the choice would replace the US Constitution with Sharia.
(Isn’t it funny how feminists have remained painfully reticent concerning this threatening prospect?)
Hillary Clinton (along with other Western leaders) has sacrificed citizens on the blood-soaked altar of Allah. Her stunning appeasement of all things Islam has not only served to embolden the enemy, but has probably also contributed to the brutal annihilation of thousands.
Just last week ISIS (as demanded in Koran 9:29) conveyed the following message to all Christians: “Convert, or live under the authority of Islam in humiliation.”
Despite what our cowardly and morally weak leaders are telling us, ISIS represents the very face of Islam. And it is our duty and obligation to not only confront this scourge on the battlefield with bombs and bullets, but to also confront it in the marketplace of ideas with vigorous, politically incorrect dialogue.
In either case the mindset must remain the same: Death to Islam.
Commonsense dictates that the measures below are the only way to save western civilization from an increasingly barbaric and determined islam. The muslims are increasingly becoming more dangerous in the countries that have allowed them in.
T beche Netherlands will hold a general election in March of next year, and the Party for Freedom (Partij voor de Vrijheid, PVV, the party of Geert Wilders) is far ahead of any other party in the polls. Below is a notice sent out today by the PVV outlining the party’s plan for the countr
Millions of Dutch citizens have simply had enough of the Islamization of our country. Enough of mass immigration and asylum, terror, violence and insecurity.
Here is our plan: instead of financing the entire world and people we don’t want here, we’ll spend the money on ordinary Dutch citizens.
This is what the PVV will do:
|1.||De-islamize the Netherlands
|2.||The Netherlands independent again. Leave the EU|
|3.||Direct democracy: a binding referendum, power to the citizens|
|4.||Completely abolish health care deductibles|
|5.||Lower housing fees|
|6.||Retirement age at 65, indexation of supplementary pensions|
|7.||No public money for development aid, windmills, art, innovation, broadcasting, etc.|
|8.||Rollback cuts in home care and elderly care, more hands on the bed|
|9.||A lot of extra money for defense and police|
|10.||Lower income taxes|
|11.||Halving of car taxes|
As hardly a few days pass without some Islamic terror attack in the West—recently and as of this writing an “Allahu Akbar” shouting Muslim man stabbed a Jew in France and an “Allahu Akbar” screaming Muslim woman ran over two policemen in Canada—the West risks becoming desensitized to and seeing Islamic violence as “just another part of life.”
The words and deeds of Western leaders are not helping. After the Islamic terror attack in Nice, France, where 84 were killed, counterterrorism chief Patrick Calvar said: “Today, France is clearly the most threatened country. The question about the threat is not to know ‘if’ but ‘when’ and ‘where’.” Prime Minister Manuel Valls declared that “Terrorism … is a threat that weighs heavily on France and will continue doing so for a long time.”
As if such resignation wasn’t bad enough, at the memorial event for the 84 Nice victims, Valls declared, “Times have changed and we should learn to live with terrorism.”
Actually, the main thing to change with time in France is its demography. The largest Muslim population of Europe resides there and, in accordance’s with Islam’s Rule of Numbers, is the real reason why France “should learn to live with terrorism.”
More apathy was in the air during the Munich massacre, where a Muslim gunman killed nine.
While somberly addressing the massacre still in progress—with the usual boilerplate “our hearts go out to [X victim of terror]”—U.S. President Obama managed to crack a joke, grin, chuckle, and draw laughter from his audience.
After all, what is the big deal? Shouldn’t we be used to Muslims rampaging and killing by now? And really, what’s nine dead compared to the many hundreds killed by Islamic terrorists around the world in recent weeks?
As for the leader of the nation where the attack took place, Angela Merkel waited almost 24 hours before she delivered yet another perfunctory speech containing all the usual words, condolences, and platitudes.
Then again, what was the hurry? Muslims abusing, raping, and killing Germans in Germany is old hat. A new poll by ZDF found that a record 75 percent of Germans “expect”—which is not unlike accept—more terror attacks in their nation. Must a statement be made after every single one?!
Needless to say, lesser Islamic terror attacks which once would’ve been extremely newsworthy and received condemnation from the highest echelons of the political wrung now receive perfunctory or no media coverage and little comment.
On July 18 in Germany, another “Allahu Akbar” shouting, axe-waving Muslim attacked train passengers and critically injured five. The next day, on July 19 in France, a Muslim man stabbed a woman and her three daughters—the eight-year-old was left with a punctured lung and in critical condition—for being “scantily dressed.”
No immediate comments from Merkel and Valls. (See here for numerous other examples of “minor” and “everyday” Muslim “disturbances” in Europe—such as vandalizing churches and urinating on St. Mary statues—that get little or no coverage or comment.)
Western people had better wise up: in the field of behavioral psychology, “systematic desensitization” is a well-known and effective form of graduated exposure therapy used “to help effectively overcome phobias and other anxiety disorders.” Consider the following succinct definition with my relevant examples in brackets:
Systematic desensitization is when the client [the West] is exposed to the anxiety-producing stimulus [Islamic violence] at a low level [reports and images of Islamic violence “over there” in the Mideast], and once no anxiety is present a stronger version of the anxiety-producing stimulus is given [reports of violence closer to home, in the West]. This continues until the individual client [the West] no longer feels any anxiety towards the stimulus [Islamic violence].
Is this the plan? Are the “global elite” producing situations, such as the manufactured “migrant crisis,” that cause the West to experience incrementally worse forms of Islamic violence, until it becomes desensitized, loses its “phobia”—in this case, “Islamophobia”—and simply “learns to live with terrorism,” in the words of France’s prime minister?
Indeed, if the attacks were to fall back to, say, just once a month, many might accept that as a “positive step” they can live with—at least in comparison to what they’ve been seeing, including four savage Islamic attacks in one recent week in Germany alone.
“Conspiracy theories” aside, a much better way exists. Acknowledge the truth—Islam is inherently violent and intolerant—and build policies on this truth. A ban on or serious vetting of Muslim immigration—which a majority of Americans support—and close monitoring of already existing mosques and Islamic centers would virtually eliminate Islamic terror from America.
For the fact remains: unlike natural disasters—earthquakes, tsunamis, tornadoes, and the like—we actually do not need to “live with” Islam.
When it comes to the connection between Islam and violence against non-Muslims, one fact must be embraced: the majority of those in positions of leadership and authority in the West are either liars or fools, or both.
No other alternative exists.
The reason for this uncharitable assertion is simple: If Islam was once a faraway, exotic religion, today we hear calls for, and see acts of, violence committed in its name—or the name of its deity “Allahu Akbar!”—practically every day. And many of us still have “ears that hear and eyes that see.”
It’s no secret: Muslims from all around the world and from all walks of life—not just “terrorists” or “ISIS”—unequivocally and unapologetically proclaim that Islam commands them to hate, subjugate or kill all who resist it, including all non-Muslim “infidels.”
This is the official position of several Muslim governments, including America’s closest “friends and allies,” like Saudi Arabia and Qatar; it’s the official position of Islamic institutions of lower and higher learning—from Bangladeshi high schools to Egypt’s Al Azhar, the world’s most prestigious Islamic university; and it’s the official position broadcast in numerous languages on Islamic satellite stations that air into Muslim homes around the world.
In short, there’s no excuse today for ignorance about Islam—especially for those in positions of leadership or authority. Yet it is precisely they who most vehemently deny any connection between Islam and violence.
The most recent example (as of this writing, that is) took place on July 18 in Germany. An axe-waving Muslim refugee attacked a number of train passengers and critically injured three. Although an ISIS flag was found in his room, although he called for the slaughter of any Muslim who dares leave Islam, although he yelled “Allahu Akbar”—Islam’s unequivocal war cry—authorities claimed “it was too early to speculate about the motives of the attacker.”
Catholic Bishop Friedhelm Hofmann of Wuerzburg, where the axe attack took place, was bewildered: “One is speechless at such a moment. This fact can not be understood.” Instead of being vigilant around Muslim migrants, he suggested “Maybe we need to help the unaccompanied young refugees even more and help them to overcome their own traumas.”
About a month earlier in Germany, this same scene played itself over: while screaming “Allahu Akbar” and “infidels must die,” another Muslim man in another train station stabbed to death one man and injured three others. Still, German authorities “found no evidence of Islamist motive.”
In neighboring France—which has “Europe’s largest Muslim minority” and is also (coincidentally?) the “most threatened country”—this sequence of events (a Muslim attacks in the name of Islam, authorities claim difficulty in finding “motive”) is becoming endemic. On July 19, a Muslim man vacationing with his pregnant wife and children stabbed a neighboring woman and her three daughters for being “scantily dressed.” The youngest girl, 8, was in critical condition with a punctured lung.
Although this is a common occurrence throughout the Muslim world—many Muslim women don the hijab precisely because they know the consequences of not doing so in public—and although French television was bold enough to say that the man, named Mohamed B, 37, “may have acted out of religious motives,” local mayor, Edmond Francou, said he preferred “not to speculate about the motive of the attack.”
A few days earlier another “Allahu Akbar” screaming Muslim killed 84 people in Nice. Yet according to French Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve, the killer’s “motives [were] not yet established.” Asked if he could at least confirm the attacker’s motives were linked to jihadism, he said, “No.” Reuters went so far as to write an article blaming France for its own terrorization.
Turning to the United States, one finds the same pattern at work, most recently when a Muslim man went into a homosexual nightclub in Orlando and killed 49. Despite the fact that ISIS regularly kills homosexuals and that the killer—who “recited prayers to Allah during the attack”—pledged his allegiance to the group, “Attorney General Loretta Lynch said that the investigation is still ongoing, and a motive has yet to be established,” while “the FBI was confused about Mateen’s motive.”
Earlier this year, Edward Archer, a convert to Islam, shot and wounded Philadelphia police officer Jesse Hartnett. He later explained his motive: “I follow Allah. I pledge my allegiance to the Islamic state. That is why I did what I did.”
Yet after showing a surveillance video of Archer in Islamic dress shooting at Hartnett, Philadelphia mayor Jim Kenney emphatically declared:
In no way shape or form does anyone in this room believe that Islam or the teaching of Islam has anything to do with what you’ve seen on the screen….It is abhorrent. It is terrible and it does not represent the religion or any of its teachings. This is a criminal with a stolen gun who tried to kill one of our officers. It has nothing to do with being a Muslim or following the Islamic faith.
One can go on and on. From California alone:
Most politicians—practically every democrat but also a majority of republicans, with the notable exception of Donald Trump—make the same claims. This begins with U.S. President Obama who insists that the Islamic State “is not Islamic,” calls for the “rejection by non-Muslims of the ignorance that equates Islam with terror,” and classified the Fort Hood massacre as “workplace violence,” despite the overwhelming evidence that it was jihad.
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton admonished us to bear in mind that “Muslims are peaceful and tolerant people and have nothing whatsoever to do with terrorism.” Republican leaders like John McCain gush about how “unequivocally, without a doubt, the religion of Islam is an honorable and reasonable religion. ISIS has nothing to do with the reality of Islam.” “Conservative” talking heads like Bill O’Reilly flippantly dismiss jihad as “a perversion of Islam, we all know that.”
What is to be made of all these claims from our “leaders” that fly in the face of reality? Only immensely deranged or immensely deceitful people can claim that a Muslim who cites the Koran and calls on Allah is not acting in the name of Islam.
Take your pick, but there are no other alternatives. (Note: When I make this argument, some rebut by saying that there are other alternatives—that such people are too craven, that they’ve been bought and paid for, etc. All these are different motivations that nonetheless fall under the lying category.)
Regardless of the source of the narrative that defends Islam—stupidity or deceitfulness—the same damage is done. Remember, Islam is not threatening the West due to its own innate capabilities, but because the West allows it to.
Thus the real battle revolves around getting the West to see reality—a battle which involves rooting out the liars and fools from government, media, education, and other positions of influence—an admittedly herculean task, considering that the lie is now the narrative and truth is evil.
Note: Read this follow up article responding to the argument that “liars and fools” is too simple an explanation.
The following is by author Christopher J Green:
Identity is an essential part of being human and is made up of your race, your nation and your culture. It is entirely natural to feel proud about your identity, and preservation of identity, territory and culture is a basic human right for all people. As the West continues to change at an unprecedented pace due to mass immigration, this human right is being violated on a criminal scale.
Multiculturalism, that curiously monocultural and pernicious social experiment only the West feels obliged to conduct, is making something abundantly clear: identity, territory and culture matter to every race – except one: The indigenous peoples of Western civilization.
For the last sixty years, the political elites of the West have subjected their people to a barrage of multicultural propaganda to justify mass immigration. They insisted race is merely a social construct. All people are equal, all cultures are equal and uncontrolled mass immigration will bring a welcome diversity and enrichment. Hordes of third world immigrants must be welcomed into the West and their cultures and traditions respected and tolerated.
Opposition to multiculturalism and its transformation of Western nations would be crushed through the imposition of Orwellian race laws. If Westerners dared to object to the invasion of their territories and the dilution of their cultures, they would be demonized as racists and criminalized. One can’t help but wonder how many tribes in the Third World criminalize those who want to preserve their unique tribal identities and cultures. And can you even imagine Islamic Saudi Arabia behaving in the same self-destructive manner?
To put it another way it’s a chance for our own Independence Day – today June 23rd, the day when the nation votes on the EU referendum is crucial for the future of England. I say England because I don’t care about Scotland. If they want to bugger off then so be it but let’s make sure we have proper border controls between Scotland and England.
The sooner we can get out of the corrupt, undemocratic EU the better and the sooner we can get rid of those arch manipulating liars, Cameron and Osborne the sooner we can get this country back for the people.
Hopefully the Jo Cox story will now vanish from every BBC news programme and she can go back into obscurity and rest in peace. The trial of her alleged assassin will be interesting as it is sure to be another cover up just like Hillsborough and the Pakistani rape epidemic in Rotherham.
Not for nothing were the British called Perfidious Albion. The Muslim world are told that it’s all right to lie and deceive when dealing with the infidels. The British were more cunning and deceitful than the Muslims when dealing with their enemies. In WW1 our propagandists were extremely successful in spreading gruesome stories about the exploits of the Hun.
In the second world war they had it honed to a fine art. That included dumping a cadaver off the Spanish coast carrying false details of the Allies invasion. Inflatable tanks and lorries were installed in the fields of Kent to make the Germans believe the invasion would be launched from there. Then there was the story that a very successful night fighter pilot (“Cats Eyes” Cunningham) was finding and shooting down German planes because he consumed quantities of carrots. That was said to improve his night vision but the real reason was because his aircraft was equipped with radar.
I have never known the BBC to be so blatantly biased as they are now re the referendum. Maybe I was naive before – never really saw it – but the remain camp have all the advantages behind them – a biased BBC, backroom government propaganda specialists etc. We Brits or should I say Perfidious Albion have almost been as good at manipulating the media as before and so at this time they are running rings around the Brexit lot who appear to be rank amateurs in comparison.
To cap it all they appear to have two events that were to their advantage: first the computer glitch that deprived the late voter registrations of 2 hours before the deadline SO they extended the deadline by 2 DAYS therefore giving the lackadaisical young people (more likely to vote in) time to get their act together.
Second was the killing of Jo Cox MP. Every day the death of the “perfect, saintly” Jo Cox is the subject of a new event – today is yet another memorial and voting day would have been her birthday. The killing of Jo Cox must go down as the most manipulated of any by government. It stopped the runaway success of the Brexit campaign dead in it’s tracks. On that basis who gained by her death, and who arranged it?
In the US both Robert Kennedy and John Lennon were assassinated by mentally ill killers under strange circumstances believed by some to have been manipulated by the CIA as some sort of “robotic drone”. No doubt there are more.
Is it possible that the same thing has happened to Jo Cox? Let’s face it not necessarily the government, but their puppet masters, the “dark forces” that were possibly implicated in the death of Princess Diana. One thing is for sure – we will never know the truth it will be buried forever and will never come out in court – with the likes of the Freemasons, Bildenbergers, MI6 etc all capable of pulling the strings.etc.
They desperately want the UK to remain in the EU because Brexit could mean an awful lot of snouts could be put out of joint and removed from the trough. Soros is a case in point. No doubt he will make millions if his efforts in manipulating the pound bear fruit.
That is a man we don’t need on this earth. If only someone with a gun . . . . .
The following is an accurate reflection of the current paradigm:
One of the things I have noticed increasingly is how the media** is labelling anyone who doesn’t subscribe to accepting enforced mass immigration by Islamics who hate us and our culture and our country, but loves to rape white girls, as the Far Right.
In other words anyone who is normal is by their implication an extremist. This is clearly part of the Coudenhove – Kalergi globalist agenda and is straight out of the communist handbook on how to oppress the people.
We need to confront this revision of normality that seeks to make normal behaviour out to be abnormal wherever we see it, with great prejudice, and tell them that it is they who are the extremists and fanatics for wishing democide of the British people.
taken from a comment by NortyNina in Morgroth’s Review
Bad Behavior has blocked 196 access attempts in the last 7 days.