The Liars That Lead Us.

I found this article at the website of Raymond Ibrahim. Hat tip to Gates of Vienna:

When it comes to the connection between Islam and violence against non-Muslims, one fact must be embraced: the majority of those in positions of leadership and authority in the West are either liars or fools, or both.

No other alternative exists.

The reason for this uncharitable assertion is simple: If Islam was once a faraway, exotic religion, today we hear calls for, and see acts of, violence committed in its name—or the name of its deity “Allahu Akbar!”—practically every day.  And many of us still have “ears that hear and eyes that see.”

It’s no secret: Muslims from all around the world and from all walks of life—not just “terrorists” or “ISIS”—unequivocally and unapologetically proclaim that Islam commands them to hate, subjugate or kill all who resist it, including all non-Muslim “infidels.”

This is the official position of several Muslim governments, including America’s closest “friends and allies,” like Saudi Arabia and Qatar; it’s the official position of Islamic institutions of lower and higher learning—from Bangladeshi high schools to Egypt’s Al Azhar, the world’s most prestigious Islamic university; and it’s the official position broadcast in numerous languages on Islamic satellite stations that air into Muslim homes around the world.

In short, there’s no excuse today for ignorance about Islam—especially for those in positions of leadership or authority.  Yet it is precisely they who most vehemently deny any connection between Islam and violence.


The most recent example (as of this writing, that is) took place on July 18 in Germany. An axe-waving Muslim refugee attacked a number of train passengers and critically injured three.   Although an ISIS flag was found in his room, although he called for the slaughter of any Muslim who dares leave Islam, although he yelled “Allahu Akbar”—Islam’s unequivocal war cry—authorities  claimed “it was too early to speculate about the motives of the attacker.”

Catholic Bishop Friedhelm Hofmann of Wuerzburg, where the axe attack took place, was bewildered: “One is speechless at such a moment. This fact can not be understood.”  Instead of being vigilant around Muslim migrants, he suggested “Maybe we need to help the unaccompanied young refugees even more and help them to overcome their own traumas.”

About a month earlier in Germany, this same scene played itself over: while screaming “Allahu Akbar” and “infidels must die,” another Muslim man in another train station stabbed to death one man and injured three others.   Still, German authorities “found no evidence of Islamist motive.”

In neighboring France—which has “Europe’s largest Muslim minority” and is also (coincidentally?) the “most threatened country”—this sequence of events (a Muslim attacks in the name of Islam, authorities claim difficulty in finding “motive”) is becoming endemic.  On July 19, a Muslim man vacationing with his pregnant wife and children stabbed a neighboring woman and her three daughters for being “scantily dressed.”  The youngest girl, 8, was in critical condition with a punctured lung.

Although this is a common occurrence throughout the Muslim world—many Muslim women don the hijab precisely because they know the consequences of not doing so in public—and although French television was bold enough to say that the man, named Mohamed B, 37, “may have acted out of religious motives,” local mayor, Edmond Francou, said he preferred “not to speculate about the motive of the attack.”

A few days earlier another “Allahu Akbar” screaming Muslim killed 84 people in Nice.  Yet according to French Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve, the killer’s “motives [were] not yet established.”  Asked if he could at least confirm the attacker’s motives were linked to jihadism, he said, “No.”  Reuters went so far as to write an article blaming France for its own terrorization.

Turning to the United States, one finds the same pattern at work, most recently when a Muslim man went into a homosexual nightclub in Orlando and killed 49.  Despite the fact that ISIS regularly kills homosexuals and that the killer—who “recited prayers to Allah during the attack”—pledged his allegiance to the group, “Attorney General Loretta Lynch said that the investigation is still ongoing, and a motive has yet to be established,”  while “the FBI was confused about Mateen’s motive.”

Earlier this year, Edward Archer, a convert to Islam, shot and wounded Philadelphia police officer Jesse Hartnett.  He later explained his motive: “I follow Allah. I pledge my allegiance to the Islamic state. That is why I did what I did.”

Yet after showing a surveillance video of Archer in Islamic dress shooting at Hartnett, Philadelphia mayor Jim Kenney emphatically declared:

In no way shape or form does anyone in this room believe that Islam or the teaching of Islam has anything to do with what you’ve seen on the screen….It is abhorrent. It is terrible and it does not represent the religion or any of its teachings. This is a criminal with a stolen gun who tried to kill one of our officers. It has nothing to do with being a Muslim or following the Islamic faith.

One can go on and on.  From California alone:

  • Despite the evidence that the Muslim couple that massacred 14 people in San Bernardino was motivated by Islamic teachings of jihad against the hated “infidel,” Obama claimed “We do not know their motivations.” Chris Hayes and MSNBC were also “baffled” in their search for a motive.
  • Despite the many indicators that the Muslim student who went on a stabbing spree in UC Merced was described as a “devout Muslim,” had an ISIS flag, and praised Allah in his manifesto—“local and federal authorities insisted that Faisal Mohammad, 18, carried out the vicious attack because he’d been banished from a study group.”
  • Despite the fact that a man named “Jihad” went to an El Monte police station, where he “used the word ‘jihad’ several times” while making a bomb threat, police “so far don’t have a motive.”

Most politicians—practically every democrat but also a majority of republicans, with the notable exception of Donald Trump—make the same claims.  This begins with U.S. President Obama who insists  that the Islamic State “is not Islamic,” calls for the “rejection by non-Muslims of the ignorance that equates Islam with terror,” and classified the Fort Hood massacre as “workplace violence,” despite the overwhelming evidence that it was jihad.

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton admonished us to bear in mind that “Muslims are peaceful and tolerant people and have nothing whatsoever to do with terrorism.”  Republican leaders like John McCain gush about how “unequivocally, without a doubt, the religion of Islam is an honorable and reasonable religion.  ISIS has nothing to do with the reality of Islam.”  “Conservative” talking heads like Bill O’Reilly flippantly dismiss jihad as “a perversion of Islam, we all know that.”

What is to be made of all these claims from our “leaders” that fly in the face of reality?  Only immensely deranged or immensely deceitful people can claim that a Muslim who cites the Koran and calls on Allah is not acting in the name of Islam.

Take your pick, but there are no other alternatives.  (Note: When I make this argument, some rebut by saying that there are other alternatives—that such people are too craven, that they’ve been bought and paid for, etc.  All these are different motivations that nonetheless fall under the lying category.)

Regardless of the source of the narrative that defends Islam—stupidity or deceitfulness—the same damage is done.  Remember, Islam is not threatening the West due to its own innate capabilities, but because the West allows it to.

Thus the real battle revolves around getting the West to see reality—a battle which involves rooting out the liars and fools from government, media, education, and other positions of influence—an admittedly herculean task, considering that the lie is now the narrative and truth is evil.

Note: Read this follow up article responding to the argument that “liars and fools” is too simple an explanation.

The Brainwashed Multiculturalists

The following is by author Christopher J Green: 

Identity is an essential part of being human and is made up of your race, your nation and your culture. It is entirely natural to feel proud about your identity, and preservation of identity, territory and culture is a basic human right for all people. As the West continues to change at an unprecedented pace due to mass immigration, this human right is being violated on a criminal scale.

Multiculturalism, that curiously monocultural and pernicious social experiment only the West feels obliged to conduct, is making something abundantly clear: identity, territory and culture matter to every race – except one: The indigenous peoples of Western civilization.

For the last sixty years, the political elites of the West have subjected their people to a barrage of multicultural propaganda to justify mass immigration. They insisted race is merely a social construct. All people are equal, all cultures are equal and uncontrolled mass immigration will bring a welcome diversity and enrichment. Hordes of third world immigrants must be welcomed into the West and their cultures and traditions respected and tolerated.


Opposition to multiculturalism and its transformation of Western nations would be crushed through the imposition of Orwellian race laws. If Westerners dared to object to the invasion of their territories and the dilution of their cultures, they would be demonized as racists and criminalized. One can’t help but wonder how many tribes in the Third World criminalize those who want to preserve their unique tribal identities and cultures. And can you even imagine Islamic Saudi Arabia behaving in the same self-destructive manner?

Continue reading

Why Islam vs other religions

I believe that “some” religions had a useful purpose when civilization was in it’s early stages and man made laws did not exist.
     Now is a different matter. Religion is somewhat ridiculous and whilst it’s harmless in most cases in others it is nothing more than a negative force.
Mormonism is a case in point. Merely a way of extracting money from it’s naive believers and allowing males to have several wives it is not attempting to convert the rest of us by violent means.
     The same goes for scientology except it is even more controlling of it’s followers and punishes those that transgress. It is also completely batty but it also does not attempt to take over the world by use of the sword.
     If I was to criticize any of the above I would NOT be labelled as racist and an extremist.
     Now if I am concerned about Islam taking over my country and express views about that I am called a racist, an extremist and the muslims would call me an islamophobe. Islam – a “so called” religion that is just as batty as the others is a danger to all freedom loving people who believe in democracy.

Bad Losers

Those who voted REMAIN get over it. Brexit won the referendum by a majority that the remain voters would have said was perfectly valid if it were the other way round. Those who were demonstrating against Brexit yesterday in parliament square yesterday should button it. It’s over, and the people have spoken, we are going OUT of the EU.
demo1 demo2
Leave voters are not selfish, racist, extremist, xenophobic, bigoted or stupid.
We voted for our children &  our grandchildren, we voted for our sovereignty, we voted for our democracy, we voted for our fishermen, we voted for our farmers, we voted for our steel industry, we voted for our NHS, we voted for our schools, we voted fo our laws, we voted for our borders, we voted for our economy, we voted for our rights, we voted for our freedom of speech & we voted for a Greater Britain.
You couldn’t be bothered to vote and WE didn’t vote for YOU!

Chance for Freedom

To put it another way it’s a chance for our own Independence Day – today June 23rd, the day when the nation votes on the EU referendum is crucial for the future of England. I say England because I don’t care about Scotland. If they want to bugger off then so be it but let’s make sure we have proper border controls between Scotland and England.


The sooner we can get out of the corrupt, undemocratic EU the better and the sooner we can get rid of those arch manipulating liars, Cameron and Osborne the sooner we can get this country back for the people.

Hopefully the Jo Cox story will now vanish from every BBC news programme and she can go back into obscurity and rest in peace. The trial of her alleged assassin will be interesting as it is sure to be another cover up just like Hillsborough and the Pakistani rape epidemic in Rotherham.

Perfidious Albion & the EU

Not for nothing were the British called Perfidious Albion. The Muslim world are told that it’s all right to lie and deceive when dealing with the infidels. The British were more cunning and deceitful than the Muslims when dealing with their enemies. In WW1 our propagandists were extremely successful in spreading gruesome stories about the exploits of the Hun.

In the second world war they had it honed to a fine art. That included dumping a cadaver off the Spanish coast carrying false details of the Allies invasion. Inflatable tanks and lorries were installed in the fields of Kent to make the Germans believe the invasion would be launched from there. Then there was the story that a very successful night fighter pilot (“Cats Eyes” Cunningham)  was finding and shooting down German planes because he consumed quantities of carrots. That was said to improve his night vision but the real reason was because his aircraft was equipped with radar.

I have never known the BBC to be so blatantly biased as they are now re the referendum. Maybe I was naive before – never really saw it – but the remain camp have all the advantages behind them – a biased BBC, backroom government propaganda specialists etc. We Brits or should I say Perfidious Albion have almost been as good at manipulating the media as before and so at this time they are running rings around the Brexit lot who appear to be rank amateurs in comparison.

To cap it all they appear to have two events that were to their advantage: first the computer glitch that deprived the late voter registrations of 2 hours before the deadline SO they extended the deadline by 2 DAYS therefore giving the lackadaisical young people (more likely to vote in) time to get their act together.

Second was the killing of Jo Cox MP. Every day the death of the “perfect, saintly” Jo Cox is the subject of a new event – today is yet another memorial and voting day would have been her birthday. The killing of Jo Cox must go down as the most manipulated of any by government. It stopped the runaway success of the Brexit campaign dead in it’s tracks. On that basis who gained by her death, and who arranged it?

In the US both Robert Kennedy and John Lennon were assassinated by mentally ill killers under strange circumstances believed by some to have been manipulated by the CIA as some sort of “robotic drone”. No doubt there are more.


Is it possible that the same thing has happened to Jo Cox? Let’s face it not necessarily the government, but their puppet masters, the “dark forces” that were possibly implicated in the death of Princess Diana. One thing is for sure – we will never know the truth it will be buried forever and will never come out in court – with the likes of the Freemasons, Bildenbergers, MI6 etc all capable of pulling the strings.etc.

They desperately want the UK to remain in the EU because Brexit could mean an awful lot of snouts could be put out of joint and removed from the trough. Soros is a case in point. No doubt he will make millions if his efforts in manipulating the pound bear fruit.

That is a man we don’t need on this earth. If only someone with a gun . . . . .


The following is an accurate reflection of the current paradigm:

One of the things I have noticed increasingly is how the media** is labelling anyone who doesn’t subscribe to accepting enforced mass immigration by Islamics who hate us and our culture and our country, but loves to rape white girls, as the Far Right.

In other words anyone who is normal is by their implication an extremist. This is clearly part of the Coudenhove – Kalergi globalist agenda and is straight out of the communist handbook on how to oppress the people.


We need to confront this revision of normality that seeks to make normal behaviour out to be abnormal wherever we see it, with great prejudice, and tell them that it is they who are the extremists and fanatics for wishing democide of the British people.

taken from a comment by NortyNina in Morgroth’s Review

Traitors With a Cause

The traitors with a cause are from the far left – and we are talking about governments and those behind the scenes who are pulling the puppet strings Their cause is to bring down capitalism in the West. To that end they have taken up with Islam which is only going to end in tears because – in the words of their hero, Karl Marx  who coined the phrase “useful idiots” – the Islamists welcome all “useful idiots” until it’s their turn to be first in the queue for decapitation with a blunt knife.


They have sown the “group – think” over many decades which has now firmly taken root and is flourishing. The group think is now the cultural hegemony of the entire Western establishment. They see evil amongst those who quite naturally, morally and ethically wish to survive as a race and culture, and they see only virtue and celebratory diversity in those who wish to destroy us.

They refuse to recognise the real problem despite the problem being explicitly codified in the Quran, freely available to purchase and study, and they disingenuously invent the scenario of murderous “right-wing” politics (as in the Jo Cox murder) where today (for the moment at least) there is none.

And the worst thing here is that if the establishment has adopted an ideology which threatens us (maybe not oldies like me, but certainly the young and yet to be born) quite literally in terms of life and death and national survival, then there will be, there can only be, any number of genuine political assassinations in the future.

Some of this post is edited partly from a post by Paul Weston of Liberty UK


Just like disease carrying mosquitoes Somali muslims seem to me to be the immigrants who we least want in the UK and should be first on the list for deportion. It seems that they are responsible for a rape plague in the UK and a criminal distribution network for crack cocaine in Scotland.


Add to those two deadly activities the fact that they are on the highest average percentage of immigrants who sponge off the British taxpayer and it is obvious that on the whole they are undesirables that contribute very little to our society that is good.

My solution: when they are convicted of a crime put them in prison for an indefinite time with a chance of freedom if they agree to be deported back to Somalia

My favourite choice of prison would be built on a remote, unpopulated, windswept Scottish island, but in the meantime Holloway womens prison is closing so could be used in the meantime for illegal immigrants that we don’t want here – not just Somalians.

Pat Condell on Rape in Sweden

Pat Condell at his best. His attack on the Swedish media for covering up the huge incidences of the rape of Swedish women by muslims is right on target.

The muslim minority hold beliefs which are totally incompatible with the culture of the white majority – and that’s the whole of Europe, not just Sweden. Add in the FACT that the quran instructs them to rape infidel women and we have a serious problem. The thing is what to do about it – I can dream can’t I?

(1) repatriate ALL offenders not born in Sweden

(2) all citizen offenders born in Sweden should be made stateless and handed over to the UN for resettlement.

(3) Those that can’t be repatriated should be incarcerated for life on a remote island    prison colony. Add murderers to the mix also.

Sweden has the highest incidents of rape in Europe. The rest of Europe has rapidly rising rape incidents so my solution is for all.

I said I can dream didn’t I?